Safeguarding Research
What Do I Need to Do?
Find your situation below to see which requirements apply to you:
📋 Applying for NSERC, SSHRC, or CIHR?
STRAC attestation required if your research aims to advance a sensitive technology area. For Alliance and other partnered programs, also complete RAF if you have a qualifying private-sector partner.
→ STRAC Requirements🔬 Applying for CFI funding?
STRAC attestation required if your research aims to advance a sensitive technology area. RAF required if you have a private-sector partner with an active research role, housing infrastructure, or contributing >$500K.
→ STRAC + NSGRP🍁 Applying for ORF or ERA?
Complete Ontario's Mitigating Economic and Geopolitical Risk Checklist and Attestation Form.
→ Provincial Requirements🏢 Have an industry partner on a federal grant?
For NSGRP-scope programs (Alliance, CFI, partnered CIHR), complete RAF and develop a mitigation plan. Contact Research Services for due diligence support.
→ Risk Mitigation + NSGRP👤 Hosting a visiting researcher?
Contact Andrew Austin for background screening before they arrive. Lead time of 2-4 weeks recommended.
→ Get in Touch✈️ Travelling internationally?
Book a travel consultation and prepare your devices. Required for high-risk destinations; recommended for all international research travel.
→ Travel Security ResourcesNot sure what applies? Contact us and we'll help you figure it out.
What is Research Security?
Research security protects the integrity of your research from threats that could undermine Canada's national and economic security. It's about safeguarding your work against theft, misappropriation, and unauthorized transfer of ideas, research outcomes, and intellectual property.
This isn't abstract policy talk—it's practical protection for your research environment.
What's at stake:
- Your intellectual property: Research findings, data, methodologies, and innovations you've spent years developing.
- National security: Advanced technologies that could be weaponized or used for surveillance.
- Economic competitiveness: Innovations that drive Canadian prosperity.
- Your career: Funding eligibility, institutional reputation, and research partnerships.
- Public trust: The credibility of Canadian research as a whole.
Shared responsibility: Research security works only when everyone plays their part. Researchers, institutions, federal funding agencies (CIHR, NSERC, SSHRC, CFI), and the Government of Canada all share responsibility for protecting Canada's research ecosystem.
The reality check: Research security doesn't mean shutting down international collaboration. Canada values global partnerships—they're essential for advancing knowledge. But collaboration requires diligence. You need to know who you're working with, understand the risks, and take appropriate precautions.
Federal Guidelines & Resources
STRAC Policy
The Government of Canada's Policy on Sensitive Technology Research and Affiliations of Concern (STRAC) became effective May 1, 2024. This policy directly affects how Lakehead researchers can access federal funding from NSERC, CIHR, SSHRC, and CFI.
The policy operates on two lists that work together:
- Named Research Organizations (NRO): 103+ foreign institutions connected to military, defence, or state security entities. If you're affiliated with any organization on this list while working on sensitive technology research, your federal grant application will be denied.
- Sensitive Technology Research Areas (STRA): 11 categories of advanced technologies (AI, quantum computing, genetic engineering, advanced weapons, etc.). If your research aims to advance these technologies—not just use them—STRAC applies to you.
Your Responsibility: Before applying for federal funding, you must review both lists. If your research advances a STRA, all named researchers on your grant must attest that they have no NRO affiliations. Past affiliations don't count—only current ones matter. If you hold an NRO affiliation, you must sever it before applying. The government plans to update these lists regularly, so please check them each time you apply for funding.
Does Your Research "Advance" a Sensitive Technology?
This is the critical distinction. Many researchers assume STRAC doesn't apply because they're "just using" existing technology. That's often wrong. Here's how to tell the difference:
Your research ADVANCES a STRA if it:
- Develops new capabilities, methods, or applications within a sensitive technology area
- Improves the performance, efficiency, or functionality of existing sensitive technologies
- Creates new knowledge that could enable others to develop sensitive technologies
- Produces results that have dual-use potential (civilian and military applications)
Your research likely does NOT advance a STRA if it:
- Uses commercially available AI tools as instruments without modifying them
- Applies existing technologies to study unrelated phenomena (e.g., using machine learning to analyze historical texts)
- Studies the social, ethical, or policy implications of sensitive technologies without developing them
Real-World Examples
✓ STRAC likely does NOT apply:
Dr. A is an environmental scientist using commercial satellite imagery and existing machine learning tools to map deforestation patterns. She's applying existing technology as a research tool—not advancing AI or remote sensing capabilities.
✓ STRAC likely does NOT apply:
Dr. B is a sociologist studying public attitudes toward AI adoption in healthcare. Her research examines how people perceive and interact with AI systems—she's not developing or improving any AI technology.
✗ STRAC DOES apply:
Dr. C is developing new machine learning algorithms that improve the accuracy of medical image analysis. Even though the application is healthcare, she's advancing AI/ML capabilities—STRAC applies.
✗ STRAC DOES apply:
Dr. D is a materials scientist developing new battery technologies for electric vehicles. His research advances energy storage capabilities, which falls under advanced materials/manufacturing—STRAC applies.
⚠ Grey area—consult us:
Dr. E is adapting an existing open-source AI model for a specific forestry application. She's fine-tuning parameters but not fundamentally changing the model architecture. This is the kind of case where the line between "using" and "advancing" gets blurry—contact us.
National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships (NSGRP)
The NSGRP integrates national security considerations into the development, evaluation, and funding of research partnerships.
The Risk Assessment Form is a tool to identify and assess potential risks that research partnerships may pose to Canada's national security.
Additional Resources:
Provincial Guidelines
Ontario is implementing steps to ensure that national and provincial security within our world-class research ecosystem is of the utmost priority. The Ministry of Colleges and Universities has released the Research Security Guidelines for Ontario Research Funding Programs.
What Ontario Requires
The provincial guidelines go beyond federal requirements in some areas. You must provide:
- Disclosure of collaborations with organizations of concern AND involvement with foreign entities: This is broader than STRAC—you need to disclose all foreign entity involvement, not just NRO affiliations.
- A completed risk checklist: The Mitigating Economic and Geopolitical Risk Checklist must be completed for all applications.
- A risk identification and mitigation plan: If risks are identified, you must describe specific measures to address them.
- An attestation: The Application Attestation Form confirms the accuracy of your disclosures.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Incomplete disclosures: Listing only formal affiliations while omitting visiting positions, advisory roles, or consulting relationships.
- Vague mitigation plans: "We will be careful" isn't a mitigation plan. Specify concrete measures: access controls, data handling protocols, IP agreements.
- Inconsistency between forms: Your checklist and attestation must align. Discrepancies trigger additional scrutiny.
Risk Mitigation: Protecting Your Research
Risk mitigation isn't bureaucratic box-checking—it's the systematic process of identifying threats to your research and implementing practical measures to address them. Strong risk mitigation protects your work, maintains your funding eligibility, and demonstrates due diligence to granting agencies and collaborators.
Why it matters: The federal granting agencies assess your risk mitigation plan when evaluating funding applications involving private-sector partnerships or sensitive technology research. Weak or absent mitigation strategies can result in rejected applications, withheld funding, or terminated grants. High-risk partnerships with insufficient mitigation simply won't get funded.
How to Build Effective Risk Mitigation
- Start early: Conduct risk assessments at the beginning of partnership discussions.
- Conduct open-source due diligence: Research your potential partners thoroughly. Check their institutional affiliations, funding sources, and ownership structures.
- Validate through direct consultation: Talk directly with your potential partners about their affiliations and motivations.
- Assess alignment: Determine whether your partner's motivations align with yours.
Key Areas Your Risk Mitigation Plan Should Address
- Research team composition: Build a team with appropriate security clearances, institutional affiliations, and awareness of research security requirements. All named researchers must comply with STRAC Policy requirements if working in sensitive technology areas.
- Cybersecurity and data management: Implement robust protections for research data, methodologies, and intellectual property. This includes secure storage, access controls, encryption, and protocols for data sharing with partners.
- Agreement on research outcomes: Establish clear written agreements about intellectual property ownership, publication rights, and intended use of research findings. Define what happens if security concerns arise mid-project.
- Physical security: Control access to research facilities, labs, and equipment. Implement sign-in procedures for visitors and ensure only authorized personnel have access to sensitive areas.
- Monitoring and Reporting: Establish mechanisms to detect security incidents and report them promptly.
Implementation and Compliance
Once your mitigation plan is approved, you must implement it. This isn't optional. Your award agreement stipulates that you'll follow the mitigation measures you identified, and you must maintain them until you submit your final financial report.
Monitor your mitigation plan continuously. If circumstances change—new partners join, research scope shifts, or risks evolve—you must immediately update your risk assessment and notify the granting agency. Changes that increase national security risk require submitting a new RAF before proceeding.
The Reality
Strong risk mitigation enables research partnerships that might otherwise be too risky to pursue. It demonstrates professionalism, protects Canadian interests, and reassures international collaborators that you operate in a secure environment. Weak mitigation, conversely, jeopardizes funding, damages your professional reputation, and puts your research at risk.
Get help. Lakehead's research office can support you in developing risk assessments and mitigation strategies. Don't wait until you're facing a funding deadline—reach out when you first identify a potential partnership that might raise security concerns.
Travel Security
International travel for conferences, collaborations, and fieldwork exposes researchers to unique security risks. Foreign governments may target your devices, monitor communications, or attempt to acquire sensitive research information. Proper preparation before, during, and after travel is essential.
Our dedicated travel security page includes destination-specific guidance, device preparation checklists, and information on booking a pre-travel consultation.
Travel Security Guidelines →Cybersecurity for Researchers
Your research data, methodologies, and intellectual property are valuable targets. Cybersecurity isn't just IT's problem—it's a core component of research security that protects your work from theft, manipulation, and unauthorized access.
Our dedicated cybersecurity page covers AI usage guidelines, secure data storage, research website best practices, survey security, and more.
Cybersecurity Best Practices →Pre-Submission Checklists
Use these checklists to ensure you've addressed all research security requirements before submitting your grant application.
📋 Federal Grants
NSERC, SSHRC, CIHR, CFI
- Reviewed STRA list for my research area
- Checked NRO list for all team members
- Completed STRAC attestation (if applicable)
- Completed RAF (if industry partner involved)
- Documented risk mitigation measures
🍁 Ontario Grants
ORF, ERA, Provincial Programs
- Disclosed all foreign entity involvement
- Completed Mitigating Risk Checklist
- Completed Application Attestation Form
- Checklist and attestation are consistent
- Risk mitigation plan is specific (not vague)
🏢 Industry Partnerships
Private Sector Collaborations
- Researched partner's ownership structure
- Checked partner against sanctions lists
- Completed Risk Assessment Form
- IP agreement addresses security concerns
- Data handling protocols established
Frequently Asked Questions
Glossary of Terms
Affiliation
A formal or informal connection to an organization, including employment, visiting positions, advisory roles, consulting arrangements, honorary titles, or receiving funding/resources. Casual networking doesn't typically count.
Dual-Use Research
Research that has legitimate civilian applications but could also be misused for military purposes, weapons development, or other harmful ends. Many sensitive technologies are dual-use by nature.
Named Research Organization (NRO)
A foreign institution identified by the Government of Canada as having connections to military, defence, or state security entities that pose national security risks. Researchers with NRO affiliations cannot receive federal funding for sensitive technology research.
NSGRP (National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships)
Federal guidelines requiring researchers to assess and mitigate national security risks in research partnerships, particularly those involving private-sector collaborators or foreign entities.
RAF (Risk Assessment Form)
A standardized form used to identify and evaluate potential national security risks in research partnerships. Required for grants involving private-sector partners or other risk factors.
Sensitive Technology Research Area (STRA)
One of 11 categories of advanced technologies identified by the Government of Canada as having national security implications. Includes AI/ML, quantum science, advanced materials, biotechnology, and others. Research that advances (not just uses) these technologies triggers STRAC requirements.
STRAC (Policy on Sensitive Technology Research and Affiliations of Concern)
The federal policy (effective May 2024) that prohibits researchers with NRO affiliations from receiving federal funding for research that advances sensitive technologies. Requires attestation from all named researchers on applicable grants.
Tri-Agency
The three federal research funding agencies: CIHR (health research), NSERC (natural sciences and engineering), and SSHRC (social sciences and humanities). CFI (infrastructure) often aligns with Tri-Agency policies.
Training Resources
Lakehead University Training
The Office of Research Services holds workshops and events around research security throughout the year. Subscribe to the Research & Innovation weekly bulletin for announcements.
Required Training: Register for the "Research Security Training" module on MyCourseLink (Self-Registration Page). This includes two ISED workshops:
- Introduction to Research Security
- Cyber Security for Researchers
ISED Self-Paced Courses (30-40 minutes each)
The Government of Canada offers three free courses on the ISED Learning platform (GCKey login available):
Public Safety Canada | Safeguarding Science (Live Workshops)
Public Safety's Research Security Centre offers Safeguarding Science, a series of 60-90 minute live workshops covering:
- Best practices for maintaining a security-conscious research organization
- Tools to recognize and mitigate research security risks
- Understanding sensitive and dual-use technology
Who Should Attend: Researchers, research staff, students, administrators, IT staff, and security personnel.
French virtual sessions available on the French Safeguarding Science page.
2026 Session Schedule
Click on a module below to view details. Registration links will be posted as they become available on the Public Safety Safeguarding Science page.
We encourage you to take all training modules!
Need Help? Contact Our Specialist
For personalized assistance with STRAC/NSGRP compliance, risk assessments, visitor screening, travel consultations, or any other research security questions, please reach out.
Andrew Austin
Research Security & Data Management Specialist
